The name 'Jesus' originated from the Roman emperor Constantine  

http://thecreatorscalendar.com/wp-content/uploads/PDF_Constantines-Creation-of-Jesus-Christ-11-04-14-Autosaved.pdf
http://sabbathcovenant.com/the-false-messiah/

The Son of God knew His earthly name would be changed by Satan the Devil.  He knew that after Satan saw what power His name had in healing people and freeing them from demon possession, the Devil would have His true name changed to a false one.

He indicated that very clearly when he told His disciples at Matthew 24:5 that many would be deceived by a false Messiah coming on the 'basis of His name'.  At Matthew 24:9, just 4 verses later, He told them that they would be 'hated on account of His name'.

Most people do not pick up on the apparent contradiction between those two verses.   He was telling them that a fake Messiah will appear using what people believe is His name, now 'Jesus'.  

When the 'Two Witnesses' start their 'prophesying for 1260 days', they will use His real Name, which is YAH'USHA.  (Revelation 11)  His followers will be 'hated on account of His true name'. 

Yahusha is the name that Moses was told to change his military commander's name to.  (Numbers 13:16)

He is now falsely called 'Joshua' by most, but his original name given by his parents was 'Usha'.   The Almighty told Moses to add 'Yah' to the beginning of his name, so his name became 'Yahusha'.

In the 1958 version of DeHoff's Bible Handbook, on page 301, the chapter about the 1st century historical record of 'James', who wrote the Book of James, and states that:

'Josephus, the Jewish historian, says that shortly before the war that destroyed Jerusalem, "Ananias the high priest, assembled the Sanhedrin and brought before them the brother of Jesus who is called Christ and whose name was changed... "  

This historical writing of Josephus is a translation into English from his Antiquities xx 20 9:1 written in ancient Hebrew.  The name 'Jesus' wasn't used until after 1630 CE when the letter 'J' was added to the English language.  He most definitely used the name YAH'USHA, not 'Jesus'.

Other historians in the 1st and 2nd centuries used either Christus, or Chrestos for His name.

https://reasonabletheology.org/jesus-outside-the-bible-1-tacitus/

https://bib.irr.org/tacitus-suetonius-and-historical-jesus

http://andrewjacobs.org/christianorigins/suettac.htm

Using startpage.com you can find more references to the original false name by typing in the search term 'Tacitus and Suetonius used the name Christus'.

In 325 C.E. at the Council of Nicaea, emperor Constantine wanted to united the different religions of the Roman empire into one state religion:

From his extensive research into Church councils, Dr. Watson concluded that "the clergy at the Council of Nicaea were all under the power of the devil, and the convention was composed of the lowest rabble and patronized the vilest abominations" (An Apology for Christianity, op. cit.).

 It was that infantile body of men who were responsible for the commencement of a new religion and the theological creation of Jesus Christ.

Constantine's intention at Nicaea was to create an entirely new god for his empire who would unite all religious factions under one deity. Presbyters were asked to debate and decide who their new god would be. Delegates argued among themselves, expressing personal motives for inclusion of particular writings that promoted the finer traits of their own special deity. Throughout the meeting, howling factions were immersed in heated debates, and the names of 53 gods were tabled for discussion.

"As yet, no God had been selected by the council, and so they balloted in order to determine that matter... For one year and five months the balloting lasted..."

(God's Book of Eskra, Prof. S. L. MacGuire's translation, Salisbury, 1922, chapter xlviii, paragraphs 36, 41).

At the end of that time, Constantine returned to the gathering to discover that the presbyters had not agreed on a new deity but had balloted down to a shortlist of five prospects...

Constantine was the ruling spirit at Nicaea and he ultimately decided upon a new god for them. To involve British factions, he ruled that the name of the great Druid god, Hesus, be joined with the Eastern Savior-god, Krishna (Krishna is Sanskrit for Christ), and thus Hesus Krishna would be the official name of the new Roman god.

A vote was taken and it was with a majority show of hands (161 votes to 157) that both divinities became one God. Following longstanding heathen custom, Constantine used the official gathering and the Roman apotheosis decree to legally deify two deities as one, and did so by democratic consent.

A new god was proclaimed and "officially" ratified by Constantine (Acta Concilii Nicaeni, 1618). That purely political act of deification effectively and legally placed Hesus and Krishna among the Roman gods as one individual composite. 

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/biblianazar/esp_biblianazar_40.htm

After the 381 CE council of Nicaea, the Messiah's false name 'Christus' was changed to 'Hesus Krishna', the same name as the dual demon god that the rest of the Roman empire had to use as their God.  That council declared that the Son of God was God as the 'Father in the flesh'.  

So they were in compliance with Constantine's edict to use the same name 'Hesus Krishna' for their God, as all other worshiper's in the Roman empire were required. 

Krishna is the satanic, eastern mythical savior demon God.  'Hesus Krishna' became 'Iesous Christus' or 'Christous' in Greek due to the satanic Greek 'Christian' leaders that partnered with the Roman Catholic Church for 150 years between the 10th and 11th century. 

Satanic occult Greek orthodox 'believers' mixed their ancient pagan beliefs with the scriptures.  They started using the Greek name 'Christus' for the title of the Son of God, rather than 'Messiah'.  

The satanic occultists put oil on the foreheads when initiating new recruits to their satanic coven that performed rituals and ceremonies to their Greek spirit god 'Christus'. 

So 'Christus' was a Greek demon god and the term 'Christian' was the term that resumed sometime after the merger of the Greek Church with the Roman Church during the 150+ so years where the Greeks had their eastern 'pope' and the Romans had their western 'pope'.

Eventually it became 'Jesus Christ' in English after 1630 CE when the letter J was added to the English alphabet.  The 1st century believers were called 'Messianics'... not 'Christians'. 

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Acts%2011:25-27&version=CJB

Yahusha literally means "Yah causing deliverance/salvation"

YAH means 'I exist', or 'self exist', so more specifically, the name translates to "self exist, causing deliverance/salvation". 

Miriam (incorrectly named Mary), the mother of the Messiah, was instructed to name God's Son's with the same Hebrew name as Moshah's (satanically changed to Moses) military general.   

'Yahusha' (the son of Nun), is the one who led the Israelites into the promised land after Moshah died.

Yahusha has now falsely been changed into both 'Joshua' and 'Jesus' in English!   

Ridiculously, Yahusha is now 'Joshua' is the pre-Messianic scriptures (Old Testament) and Jesus' in the Messianic scriptures (New Testament).  

How ludicrous is it that there can be two names in English... when the name is exactly the same name!  There is only one pronunciation in all languages for a person's name.
 

Between languages with different alphabets, the phonetic spelling will obviously be different, but that is so that the pronunciation of the name will remain the same in all languages.  
 

Proper names do not change pronunciation when speaking them in different languages.  
 

For example, if a couple of Spanish speaking men are named 'Jose' and 'Juan', their names will be pronounced the same in all languages.  People do not translate their names to 'Joseph' and 'John' if they move to an English speaking country or when speaking to them in English!
 

In George DeHoff's 1958 version of his 'Bible Handbook', on page 301, the Hebrew historian Josephus* states that shortly before the war that destroyed Yahrushalum (Jerusalem) in 70 C.E.:
"Ananias the high priest, assembled the Sanhedrin and brought before them the brother of Jesus*, who is called the Christ and whose named was changed, and some of his companions... and delivered them to be stoned" (Antiquities 20 9:1)
 

*the names of Josephus and Jesus are incorrect, but I could not find out what the Messiah's earthly name was changed to in the 1st century.  There is no 'j' sound in Biblical or in modern Hebrew.  So 'Jesus' is not the name it was changed to.  As stated below, that came later.

'Hesus' became 'Jesus' in English after 1630

There was no letter 'J' in any language until the 9th century.  It was not in the English language until around 1630.  The 1st King James version in 1611 spelled the Son of God's false name 'Iesus'.  It was not until the 17th century that 'Jesus Christ' began to be used.

Don't be fooled...

So the research shows that YAH'USHA is the true name of God's Son.... the only name with which we might get saved! If you call on the wrong person you will not be saved... PERIOD!  If you call on 'Jesus Christ'... you are calling on a false, pagan, demonic God from Satan, the one who transforms himself into an 'angel of light' to fool people.  (2 Cor 11:14, Acts 4:12, Philippians 2:9-11)

The internet is YAH'UAH's way of fulfilling the prophecy found at Daniel 12:4.  So finding real spiritual truth is imperative for those that want to 'worship the Father with spirit and truth' because 'He is looking for those ones'. His Son went on to state that all who want to worship the Father MUST worship Him in 'spirit and truth' as he stated at John 4:23-24.

'Jesus' is the name of a wicked spirit, NOT the name of the Son of God

The true names of God and His Son are NOT 'Jehovah' and 'Jesus', which are lying, slanderous, blasphemous names made up by the Devil.

1 John 4:6 New Living Translation (NLT)

6 But we belong to God, and those who know God listen to us. If they do not belong to God, they do not listen to us.  This how we know if someone has the Spirit of truth or the spirit of deception.

http://christianitybeliefs.org/the-falling-away/the-names-of-the-father-and-the-son/
https://www.sabbathcovenant.com/The%20Antichrist/AR_Chapter_6.htm
http://www.krishna.com/krishna-or-christ-name-same
http://forums.catholic.com/showthread.php?t=219882

We need to make sure that we are not misled and do not mislead others.  We need to research and realize that 'Jesus' was NOT the name of God's Son, but many 'false Christ's' will come in that name to mislead many.

Matthew 24:3-5

3  While he was sitting on the Mount of Olives, the disciples approached him privately, saying: “Tell us, when will these things be, and what will be the sign of your presence and of the conclusion of the system of things?”4  In answer Jesus (YAH'USHA) said to them: “Look out that nobody misleads you, 5  for many will come on the basis of my name, saying, ‘I am the Christ (the Messiah),’ and will mislead many.

Even well-meaning religious people that promote the name 'Jesus' as the true name of the Son of God are playing into Satan's hand and are helping to set people up to be misled by the fake '2nd coming of Jesus' and obey a 'false Christ' instead of obeying the true Son of God, YAH'USHA.

YAH'USHA:  The true earthly Name of the Son of God

The name 'Jesus' originally comes from the name of the satanic spirit God 'Hesus', the spirit God of the demonic Druids.

The Jesuits (which means the 'Society of Jesus') also secretly worship this exact same demon/wicked spirit!  The Jesuits have wickedly, falsely and blasphemously promoted the name of their spirit God 'Jesus' as the earthly name of God's Son!

There is no historical proof that a person by the name of 'Jesus the Christ' ever lived.  All documents with that false name are forgeries of the original that had YAH'UASHA's name!

http://www.truthbeknown.com/christconspiracy.html

The term 'Satan' originally applied to the first opposer/adversary, the devil himself, but now applies to any wicked spirit 'as a title' for those that 'oppose' the Creator.  In the same way, the name 'Jesus' now applies to any wicked spirit who deceptively appear to be... the 'Lord'!

My internet search produced numerous websites for "The name Jesus Christ comes from "Hesus Krishna" (changed to "Iesous Christos" in Greek and EVENTUALLY to "Jesus Christ" in English).

Websites like the ones below sums up what I have found about the Roman emperor Constantine, when he wanted to unite the Roman empire 'under one God' at the Council of Nicaea in 325 CE:

"To involve British factions, he ruled that the name of the great Druid god, Hesus, be joined with the Eastern Saviour-god, Krishna (Krishna is Sanskrit for Christ), and thus Hesus Krishna would be the official name of the new Roman god.

A vote was taken and it was with a majority show of hands (161 votes to 157) that both divinities became one God. Following longstanding heathen custom, Constantine used the official gathering and the Roman apotheosis decree to legally deify two deities as one, and did so by democratic consent.

A new god was proclaimed and "officially" ratified by Constantine (Acta Concilii Nicaeni, 1618). That purely political act of deification effectively and legally placed Hesus and Krishna among the Roman gods as one individual composite.

That abstraction lent Earthly existence to amalgamated doctrines for the Empire's new religion; and because there was no letter "J" in (any) alphabets until around the ninth century, the name subsequently evolved into "Jesus Christ".

http://www.sabbathcovenant.com/doctrine/hesus_krishna.htm

Jesuits: first ones to promote the false name of their satanic spirit God 'Hesus'

The Jesuits were the first ones to promote the false name of their satanic God 'Jesus', replacing the true earthly name of God's Son.  This false name hides 'the Name that is above all others', 'the only Name by which we must get saved'.

Satan controls the world thru the Jesuits who sit in the 'mother seat as the whore of Babylon' and control all political, financial, industrial, medical, cultural and religious institutions of the world.

They attempt to corrupt as many humans as possible so that they also will reject the true Son of God, His teachings and His brothers, the true anointed 'chosen ones'.

http://www.kt70.com/~jamesjpn/articles/john_todd_and_the_illuminati.htm

So 'Jesus', the satanic god of the original, as well as current high level Jesuits, comes from 'Hesus', the demon God of the Druids.  The name was deliberately changed from 'Hesus' to 'Jesus' when the letter J was added to English 500+ years ago to obscure the SATANIC ORIGIN of the name 'Jesus'!

So this 'Hesus/Jesus' is whom the Druids and top ranking Jesuits covertly worship even today!

What was the Catholic church trying to hide?

IN 1415, THE CHURCH OF ROME TOOK AN EXTRAORDINARY STEP TO destroy all knowledge of two Second Century Jewish books that it said contained ‘the true name of Jesus Christ.’
http://forums.catholic.com/showthread.php?t=219882

The Jesuits are an offspring of the satanic Knights Templar's, who originally participated in the Crusades that had gone to Yahrushalom (now known as Jerusalem), to find the 'Holy Grail' in the ruins of Solomon's temple.           https://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message2008984/pg1?disclaimer=1

This 'Holy Grail' was actually one of the two Grimoires given to Solomon from Satan, after Solomon turned apostate!  The one grimoire had already been taken to Europe, and when the Knights Templar's read it, they realized there was a 2nd grimoire transcribed by Solomon.

So the crusades were started because the satanic Knights Templar's were searching for either the 'Greater Key of Solomon', or the 'Lesser Key of Solomon'.  They must have been told by the Devil or his wicked spirits that the other one was in the ruins of Solomon's temple.
http://blog.templarhistory.com/2010/03/the-templars-and-the-holy-grail/

(A grimoire is a satanic book on how to conjure up demons and summon powerful spirits to perform demonic works on their behalf by using black magic rituals outlined in a satanic grimoire book.  'Hesus/Jesus' is one of those powerful wicked spirits!)
http://www.webster-dictionary.org/definition/grimoire
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0WxjTzT_VdM

The Knight's Templar's were outlawed on Friday, October 13th, 1307.  King Philip IV of France, in league with Pope Clement V, ordered all Templar's to be rounded up and thrown in prison.  Some fled to Switzerland with their wealth, which is why it has been a banking center for centuries, and others to Scotland.
http://blog.templarhistory.com/2010/03/did-the-templars-form-switzerland/

Jesuits: the first ones to use 'Jesus' as the false earthly name of the Son of God

At some point the Templar's that went to Scotland met up and joined the Druids.  They obviously also began to worship 'Hesus', the demon god of the Druid's because they become known as the 'Society of Hesus'.  Later, they became the 'Society of Jesus' when the letter 'j' was added to alphabets, which is what the 'Jesuits' actually means.

While I disagree with a few things from the website below from the supposed Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek scholar Lew White, such as his research on the origin of the false name 'Jesus',  I do agree with Lew about the Jesuits being the first ones to use 'Jesus' as the false earthly name of the Son of God. 

As outlined above, the Jesuits were the first to use 'Jesus' when the 'J' was added to the English language, but Lew does not seem to know that the Catholic church, from the influence of what is now known as the Greek Orthodox church, used 'Iesous', supposedly meaning son of 'Zeus'. 

Lew also does not seem to understand the connection between the Jesuits, the Knights Templar's and the Druids and that the real origin of the false earthly name of the God's Son goes all the way back to those Druids and the Roman Emperor Constantine at the Council of Nicaea in 325 C.E. http://www.fossilizedcustoms.com/transliteration.html

Variations of the false earthly name of the Son of God

YESHUA is NOT the true earthly name of God's Son, as some believe.

The form "YESHUA" has been adapted to form the acronym "YESHU", a mutilation of Yahusha's Name used by unbelieving Yahudim (now known as Jews) during the late 1st and 2nd century CE.    The letters in "YESHU" stood for the sentence, "may his name be blotted out"  (from the scroll of life).

Lew wrote about the use of 'Yeshua' as the Son of God's name:

"Yeshua" Or "Yahusha"?   "Joshua" isn't quite right; and "Yeshua" hides the Name of Yahuah, and Gabriel's explanation of the Name at Luke 1:21 describes the function (salvation) along with Who is providing that salvation.

Q: Where did we get the form "JESUS" from?

A:   The Jesuits    (They defend the form using the Greek and Latin, hoping you'll never discover what you are about to read):  
http://www.fossilizedcustoms.com/transliteration.html

Look at the following info found at the websites below:

http://www.fossilizedcustoms.com/transliteration.html
https://askdrbrown.org/can-we-please-stop-with-this-yahshua-nonsense/

What Is the true Hebrew Name for the falsely named 'JESUS'?

THE MESSIAH'S NAME IS FOUND 219 TIMES...

In 216 of these, the spelling is:  yod-hay-uau-shin-ayin:  YAHUSHA
As of our current research on this topic reveals, these are the spellings found in the TaNaK:
216 times found:  Yahusha    YOD-HAY-UAU-SHIN-AYIN
2 times found:  Yahushua     YOD-HAY-UAU-SHIN-UAU-AYIN
1 time found:  Y’shua  (Neh. 8:17)  YOD-SHIN-UAU-AYIN
The definition of "SHUA", #7770, is given as "a cry for HELP" (to deliver, rescue, save); and this is from a ROOT, the word YASHA, spelled yod-shin-ayin #3467.

So, upon closer scrutiny it is simple to understand when the connection to the root is properly applied to it.

Often a primary root is overlooked, but in this case the root YASHA gives the component "SHA" its meaning, to deliver.

"SHA" is a component in the Name YAHUSHA....

Therefore, the Son came in the Name of the Father, literally.  His Name is Yahusha. It means Yahuah, who is Salvation, Delivers.

Yahu is the poetic short form of Yahuah. Sha is the masculine of the root word Yasha. The feminine is shua and it means to cry out. Since He is our Bride Groom, obviously the masculine is what applies.

The false name of yahshua is meaningless. Not a real word.

On the other hand, yeshua is a very real word. It is meant as a very derogative Hebrew acronym meaning “may his name be blotted out”.

So our Messiah's original name was Yah'usha, which means 'Yah is Salvation or Deliverance or Rescue'.

On the other hand, YAH'USHUA means... 'Yah cries out for Salvation or Deliverance or Rescue'!

(The Son of God's name does NOT mean that 'YAH, the Almighty, cries out for salvation'!  So the Son's Name CANNOT be YAH'USHUA, which is totally incorrect and would be incredibly blasphemous!)

The Talmud would like us to believe that His Son's Name is spelled JESCHU, based on YESHU, the acronym for yemach shmo u'zikro: but that means "may his name be blotted out".

(So the Son's Name is not 'YESHU' or 'YESHUA' either, which is also incredibly blasphemous as well!)
http://www.fossilizedcustoms.com/transliteration.html
https://askdrbrown.org/can-we-please-stop-with-this-yahshua-nonsense/

The 'new testament' was originally written in 4 languages

From Lew White's website, he has the following info:

In the 4th century, a "church father" named Epiphanius wrote of a "sect" of "heretics" called NATSARIM that possessed a copy of the gospel of Matthew, as it was written in the original Hebrew.

The Catholic-controlled 'Scroll team' (concerning the Dead Sea Scrolls) at Ecole Biblique has a copy of Matthew found in one of the caves in 1947,  but they have not released it to be viewed by the world.

These scrolls were retired to those caves for only one reason: the true NAME of the Creator was written on them. This means that the copy of Matthew (actually, "MattithYahu") found in the dead sea scrolls also has God's and His Son's Name correctly written on them.

But still we have the misguided impressions in seminary-trained men who think the GREEK is the final authority on this matter.  

A pastor's challenge (to Lew White) was to produce texts OLDER than AD 125 "that don't use the name Jesus"  

Lew's response:

Sure, no problem;  the Hebrew texts like the book of "Joshua" (the same name), and the scroll of MattithYahu (Matthew) discovered in the DSS (Dead Sea Scrolls), but held captive by the RCC (Roman Catholic Church). 

We don't have to play the Greek game.   There IS NO TEXT before 1630 CE that uses the spelling JESUS.

The letter "J" didn't even exist until then.  Does IESOU look or sound anything like JESUS?   There is no letter "J" on this planet until around 1630...
(not true... the letter J was in other languages such as German, but was not officially used in English until 1630)

Also, it's interesting that the GREEK text which underlies the English text uses the SAME LETTERS (IESOU) for both names, JESUS and JOSHUA can be easily seen by looking at a Greek/English interlinear at Hebrews 4 and Acts 7. 

Scholars agree that since this is the case, both our Messiah and Moshe's successor had THE SAME NAME.

(Moshah/Moses' general was YAH'USHA, now falsely known in English as 'Joshua').

The Hebrew characters for that name are yod-hay-waw-shin-ayin;  anyone who searches this out can see it in the Hebrew texts.

The reason that the Jesuits claim that the New Testament was written only in Greek is because there is no Greek letter(s) that produce the 'sh' sound in modern Greek.  So YAH'USHA cannot be properly spelled in Greek.

This does not mean that the ancient biblical Koine Greek did not have an 'sh' sound, but under the Greek Orthodox influence, the Greek language was changed, just as ancient Hebrew was changed to hide the Father's name by adding 'vav' in place of 'waw' when the 'v' sound was already available.

Promoting Greek as the only language of the New Testament is another way for the Jesuits to hide the Son of God's true name!

YAH'USHA the Messiah could speak all languages, but spoke four as a human

The Messiah spoke all four languages that were in use in 1st century Yahudah (Judah), depending on whom he was teaching in the villages to where He was preaching and teaching.

This is why the gospel accounts of His illustrations and comments sometimes differ slightly. He would give His illustrations and comments in one language, then re-state it in another language, with slight variations, so all in attendance could understand in their native language.  He was then able to get extra points of emphasis across to all that read His words in the four gospels.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Language_of_the_New_Testament

A copy of the gospel of MattithYahu (Matthew) found in the Dead Sea scolls was written in Hebrew, 'Romans' was more than likely inspired and written in Latin for those in Rome, and 'Hebrews' was inspired and written in Hebrew for the Hebrew believers in Yahrushalom (now written as 'Jerusalem').

So the gospel of Matthew appears to have been inspired and originally written in Hebrew when YAH'USHA spoke Hebrew to the people he was instructing.

Mark appears to have been inspired and originally written in Latin, as the illustrations and references Mark used would be needed for those that lived in Rome who were not familiar with the area of Yahudah (Judah/Judea) and did not speak Hebrew or Greek.  Mark's gospel quotes YAH'USHA when He was speaking Latin to His disciples and people He was instructing.

The gospel of Luke appears to have been inspired and written in Greek and quotes YAH'USHA when He spoke Greek to the people.

The gospel of John, real name is Yahuchannon (the apostle) was inspired and written in Aramaic.

YAH'USHA probably spoke Hebrew to the chief priests and the Sanhedrin, Greek to Yahuchannon (John) on the island of Patmos when he was given the Revelation, and He probably spoke in Latin to Pontius Pilate.

He even spoke a fourth language, Aramaic, several times, including when he was dying.  This is why the exact phonetic Aramaic transcription and spelling is used in those verses because the original inspired language used in the four gospel's was not Aramaic.  (Matthew 27:46) (Mark 3:17: boanerges; Mark 5:41: talitha kum; Mark 7:34: ephphatha; Mark 14:36: abba; Mark 15:22: Golgotha; Mark 15:34: "Eloi, Eloi, lama sabachthani?" which when interpreted, means My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?"

Pilate had the inscription 'King of the Jews' written in all three languages because various people in that the area spoke and wrote in one or more of those three languages. (John 19:20)

So claiming that the entire new testament was written all in Greek is a satanic Jesuit lie, inspired by the Devil!

Also, the 1st century believers spoke in the 'tongue' (language) of the people that they preached and prophesied to, as well as the new believers that they taught.  So it would not be any problem for them to write in any language necessary.

More information on these websites:

http://www.yahuahreigns.com/THE%20NAME%20OF%20THE%20MESSIAH%20REVEALED.html
http://guapotg.wordpress.com/2009/12/23/new-testament-written-in-aramic-1/
http://www.petahtikvah.com/Articles/OriginalLanguagesoftheNewTestament.htm#_ftn5

Other links

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9_LJlNqIksE&feature=youtu.be
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hpw8SmVIAtM&list=PLNZgdPxr83g8P41BqBotlBIk9CLcmW6Uh

Even in the one website cited below, it falsely states that the name 'Jesus' is a transliteration (which it is not... it is a name of the demon god of the Druids).

The first part of the article states that it comes from Yehoshua/Jehoshua, contracted to Joshua... which is not even close to 'Jesus'!

If Yehoshua/Jehoshua/Joshua is the name of Moshah's military commander, and is the exact same name that the virgin Miriam (falsely known as Mary)  was told to name her son, then why are the two names now different?  The website below admits both have the exact same name so it should be spelled the exact same way for God's Son!

Moshah is now falsely known as 'Moses' due to a Luciferian lie that claims that the one that led the Israelites out of Egypt was really an Egyptian Pharoah named Thutmosis lll.
http://www.bible.ca/archeology/bible-archeology-exodus-date-1440bc.htm

Then in the last part of the section, the website states that the name means 'Yahweh saves' (or 'Yahweh is salvation').

They totally fabricated their misinformation in using 'Yeh' as the first part of the Son of God's supposed name 'Yehoshua'.  The website then contradict themselves even further in stating that 'Yah' is the first part of what 'Jesus' name means in stating that "Yahweh saves or is salvation". 

So does God's Name, and the Son of God's Name, start with 'Yeh' or 'Yah'?

The Son's name has His Father's Name within him, as do 137 Israelite men in the Bible (compare Exodus 23:21). 

Also, YAHUSHA literally means 'YAH causes salvation', not 'YEH causes salvation'!

 2424 Iēsoús – Jesus, the transliteration of the Hebrew term, 3091 /Lṓt ("Yehoshua"/Jehoshua, contracted to "Joshua") which means "Yahweh saves" (or "Yahweh is salvation").
Strong's Greek: 2424. Ἰησοῦς (Iésous) -- Jesus or Joshua, the name of the Messiah, also three other Israelites.

Originally, believers in the Messiah were called "Messianics"

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=acts+11%3A26&version=CJB

The title "Christians" did not come about until later when the Greek Orthodox church was in charge of the Eastern part of the Roman religious empire between the 10th and 11th century.

So the false dual demon God 'Hesus Krishna' that Constantine ordained for the religions of the Roman empire morphed into 'Hesus Christos' because of the influence of the Greek Orthodox church.  Now the false name of the Son of God has become 'Jesus Christ' in English, whose followers are now called 'Christians'.
http://www.sabbathcovenant.com/book3TheGreatDesception/Chapter3.htm

Search:  Church replaced 'Krishna' with 'Christos'

It is vital to our spiritual life to know the true Name of the Most High and His Son, 'whose name is above all others under heaven and whose true name is the only name on earth with which we can be saved'.

Acts 18:26  English Standard Version (ESV)

26 He began to speak boldly in the synagogue, but when Priscilla and Aquila heard him, they took him aside and explained to him the way of God more accurately.

1 John 4:6 New Living Translation (NLT)

6 But we belong to God, and those who know God listen to us. If they do not belong to God, they do not listen to us. That is how we know if someone has the Spirit of truth or the spirit of deception.

Also, look at the verse below showing that those who use the true Name of the Father will be 'hated' and 'rejected' by their 'brothers':

I added God's correct Name to the verse below.  I believe this verse will be corrected in the 'Kingdom' version of the Bible that will be given by the heavenly Father YAH'UAH to the 'chosen ones', inside the 'Holy Mountain', at the 'secret place of the Most High', the 'place prepared by God in the wilderness' at the start of the 'Great Suffering' (aka the 'Great Tribulation').

This will occur when the 'Despicable thing that depopulates' (aka 'the disgusting and destructive thing') is 'put in place at the appointed time', and then the 'Kingdom' version of the Bible will be shared by those of the true anointed 'that have insight'.

Isaiah 66:5

5 Hear the word of YAH'UAH, you who tremble at his word:
“Your brothers, who hate you and reject you
because of my name, have said:
‘Let JEHOVAH/LORD/JESUS be glorified,
so we can see YOU rejoice.’
But they will be put to shame.”

Proverbs 30:4  Modern English Version (MEV)

4 Who has ascended up into heaven, or descended?
    Who has gathered the wind in his fists?
Who has bound the waters in a garment?
    Who has established all the ends of the earth?
What is His name, and what is the name of His son,
    if you know?

Matthew 24:4,5 NEW WORLD TRANSLATION OF THE HOLY SCRIPTURES

4  In answer Jesus said to them: “Look out that nobody misleads you, 5  for many will come on the basis of my name, saying, ‘I am the Christ,’ and will mislead many.


Daniel 11:33 New American Bible (Revised Edition) (NABRE)

33 Those with insight among the people shall instruct the many; though for a time the sword, flames, exile, and plunder will cause them to stumble.

Daniel 12:3
3 But those with insight shall shine brightly
    like the splendor of the firmament,
And those who lead the many to justice
    shall be like the stars[a] forever.
Footnotes:
    12:3 Like the stars: like the heavenly host, or angels. Cf. Mt 22:30.

Daniel 12:4  Living Bible (TLB)

4 “But Daniel, keep this prophecy a secret; seal it up so that it will not be understood until the end times, when travel and education shall be vastly increased!"